Far from home

Caltrans delays selling 710 Corridor properties until an alternative to surface connector road is approved

By Justin Chapman, Pasadena Weekly, 10/17/2013

Caltrans will hold two public workshops on Wednesday and Thursday, Oct. 24, to provide information and take public input for drafting regulations related to the sale of recently approved surplus properties in the so-called 710 Corridor, the proposed route of a surface road meant to connect the Long Beach (710) and Foothill (210) freeways.

However, a Caltrans official told the Pasadena Weekly that the agency won’t begin selling the properties until an alternative to the surface connector road is chosen sometime in spring 2015. Currently, five alternatives to the surface connector are being considered: a 4.5-mile-long tunnel, light rail, increased bus service, traffic improvements and a no-build option.

With plans to build a surface road connecting the two freeways now shelved, more than 580 homes seized through eminent domain and hardship sales by Caltrans in the 1960s are considered surplus. Due to years of neglect by the state agency, more than 180 of those structures are unoccupied or too dilapidated for habitation.

Senate Bill 416, authored by state Sen. Carol Liu, D-La Cañada Flintridge, and signed into law two weeks ago by Gov. Jerry Brown, provides for the sale of those homes by state transit officials. However, there is no timeline in the bill that requires Caltrans to sell the properties by a certain date.

"Caltrans will know how many properties will be for sale once the project is determined," said Caltrans spokesperson Maria Raptis. A draft environmental impact report for the project is set to be released sometime this spring, with the final decision expected to be made the following year.

"We can’t sell excess land until we know if there’s a project or not, and if there is where the alignment will be," Raptis said. "Even if it’s an underground tunnel, there are things like ventilation, access, maybe a maintenance area, that will have to be above ground and that may be on a property that we need. Otherwise, we’ll have to buy property back."

In a letter mailed to tenants living in the 710 Corridor, Caltrans announced that the regulations drafted at the upcoming meetings "will implement existing law (the Roberti Act) and establish the procedure for the sale of SR-710 properties which were developed as single-family or multifamily family housing and which are no longer deemed necessary for use by Caltrans (surplus residential properties)."

Under the Roberti Act and SB416, the properties must first be offered to low- to moderate-income tenants in good standing at an affordable rate. Properties must also be sold to current and former tenants at "fair market value." However, under Liu’s legislation, the properties can be sold "as is," meaning Caltrans is no longer required to make any needed repairs before selling the properties, as it was under Roberti’s law.

As for next steps, Don Justin Jones of the group United Caltrans Tenants (UCT) said they will have to see what "directives, policies and strategies come out of these workshops, and see how those are translated into deeds and actions. We’re going to approach this in good faith and remain objective."

UCT will be holding a meeting Sunday to discuss the sale of the homes.
Others are more skeptical than Jones.

"If we want something done, we have to do it ourselves," said Pasadena property rights attorney Christopher Sutton. "The first step is [Caltrans Director] Malcolm Dougherty must issue an affirmative written decision to the director of District 7 listing each individual property by address and Caltrans ID number that he finds to be ‘surplus.’ We believe these hearings are just a distraction. So we’re going to come up with a comprehensive list ourselves and petition Dougherty directly to declare them surplus, and then go to the three city councils [Pasadena, South Pasadena and Los Angeles] requesting that they also push for that. We’re going to take on the job that staff should be doing themselves."

Sutton acknowledged that SB416 is a major step forward, but he maintains serious doubts that Caltrans staff at District 7 in Los Angeles will get the job done. Sutton said the Los Angeles Caltrans office is a completely insubordinate "pirate ship" that doesn’t follow orders from Sacramento.

After Dougherty declares the properties surplus, the next step would be assigning two full-time staff members to see out the process, Sutton said.

"Unless you get the right person assigned to do this job, nothing will happen," said Sutton. "[District 7 Deputy Director] Andy Nierenberg said their unofficial plan is to start selling the homes in January 2015. They’re just going to drag their feet forever. Even if they started in January 2014 and averaged 10 sales per month it would take at least to the end of 2017 to sell all the properties."

In an email to tenants, Sutton said they should restrain their excitement for SB416 and the possibility of soon owning their homes, adding that it’s going to be "a long and tedious process."

Roberto Flores of UCT is also worried that the upcoming meetings with Caltrans aren’t being held in good faith.
"If the hearings on rental rates [held earlier this year] are any indication, we’re in trouble," said Flores. "Are these hearings just a show? Are they going to be a democratic, participatory process, or are they just going through the motions because it’s mandated? We’re concerned about that."

At a recent UCT meeting, Jones recommended that tenants start preparing for the implementation of SB416 by getting their finances in order, as well as all paperwork, contracts, correspondence and agreements they’ve had with Caltrans.

"The starting point, as far as tenants are concerned, is whether or not they have a present or former contractual relationship with Caltrans," said Jones. "You have to have that to even qualify for this bill. It can be broken down into four parts: the people, the properties, the process and the results. We’re just at the threshold of the process. The goal of our group is to make sure everyone has a roof, that there’s no loss of housing."

Flores urged tenants to adhere to an all for one and one for all mentality. He said that everyone can get the best deal if they all stick together.

"We have to unite and think in terms of all of us, as opposed to individual tenants just worrying about their own house," he said. "We are going to fight as hard as possible for a humanitarian policy that includes everyone, so no tenant is thrown out."
Another tenants group, Caltrans Tenants Association (CTA), sent out an email to tenants urging them to attend the upcoming Caltrans workshops and make their concerns known.

"Every tenant is encouraged to make their comments known at the upcoming Caltrans meetings," states the CTA email. "Our input must be included in the discussions regarding the sales process. The association will attempt to speed up the procedure and ensure that it is fair to all tenants involved. The association’s goal is to provide as complete and accurate information as possible so that we can all make wise decisions."

Sutton said it will take about a month to come up with the comprehensive list of properties that he will submit to Dougherty for consideration to be declared surplus so that the process can formally begin.
"But I remain skeptical that District 7 will ever undertake such a task, because it requires thought, commitment and the regular use of math," said Sutton. "No law is the law truly until it is implemented."

Caltrans will hold two public workshops, one from 6 to 8 p.m. Wednesday at the El Sereno Senior Citizens Center, 4818 Klamath Place, Los Angeles, and the other from 6 to 8 p.m. Thursday, Oct. 24, at the Pasadena Convention Center, Ballroom C, 300 E. Green St., Pasadena. United Caltrans Tenants will hold a meeting at 10:30 a.m. Sunday at Eastside Café, 5469 N. Huntington Drive, El Sereno.

Homegrown fun

Saturday’s Eagle Rock Music Festival goes for quality over quantity

By Justin Chapman, Pasadena Weekly, 10/3/2013

Local music lovers will converge on Eagle Rock this Saturday for the town’s annual music festival, which to some may look and feel different than in years past.

The popular and eclectic Eagle Rock Music Festival, presented by LA City Councilman Jose Huizar, is back again from 4 to 10 p.m. Saturday with fewer bands and stages but a more focused local vibe. The last remaining free festival in Los Angeles this year will feature 35 performers, including headliners Bosnian Rainbows, which includes members of The Mars Volta, as well as String Theory and special guest band Poolside.

Festival organizers at Center for the Arts Eagle Rock, a nonprofit organization with just four staff members, decided to scale down the event, now in its 15th year, following years of attendance that topped nearly 150,000 people along Colorado Boulevard, the town’s main strip. As well as nearly half as many bands, the festival will also feature one main stage and six other stylized stages, instead of the 11 stages used last year.

“When you have that many people it loses its charm,” said Julia Salazar, executive director of Center for the Arts. “We wanted to focus on making it more local, more community focused. Eagle Rock is this small town in the middle of Los Angeles. It was losing its charm. So we got back to the roots. That was what we were hearing from the community.”

‘Best of both worlds’

For the Center’s director of events, Brian Martinez, who has worked on the festival for the past 13 years, the decision to scale back meant he was able to focus more of his attention on the participating venues and restaurants to make the remaining stages creative, innovative installations.

“That’s kind of how we built this, as far as the big crowds,” he said. “We get to be really creative with the space, curate to the space and work with the folks who run the space so when you walk in you feel like a lot of thought has been put into it. This year has the best of both worlds, from the very beginnings of it to the pinnacle, which has been the last couple of years, with the huge turnouts. I mean we’re talking oceans of people.”

While there will be less entertainment, Salazar said it’s about quality and not quantity. They are utilizing the same amount of advertising but using “the right messaging.” In the end, though, however many people show up is fine with the organizers.

“If the same amount of people show up, then so be it,” said Martinez. “For us, at least on our end, we’re really trying to focus on listening to the community, working with the community and making things a lot more manageable for everybody.”

Salazar added that if fewer people show up, that would be OK as well.

“People have been mostly supportive of our decision to scale down, because I think people who live in Eagle Rock want to be able to walk around comfortably and see the bands. Last year, we brought in $2 million worth of business just that day. So businesses do very well. Neighbors forgive the parking issues. They know we listen to feedback and the Center for the Arts is very important to them, so they’re mostly supportive.”

Martinez, who grew up in Eagle Rock, said the town is a special place, one that he seeks to protect as curator of one of the largest music festivals in Los Angeles.

“I’ve seen this town grow and develop,” he said, “and within that I’m also protective of Eagle Rock, so I make sure the quality of what we’re doing with something as big as this is something that folks who also grew up here or have lived here a long time respond to and respect.”

Humble beginnings

The festival began in 1998 under the moniker “Dahlia Days,” with a handful of bands playing inside cafés and shops. Each year the crowds grew, until they were spilling into the streets. It became clear to everyone that there was an appetite for this type of event and that it needed to expand. In 2006, the Center for the Arts began negotiations with the city to close a half-mile section of Colorado Boulevard to accommodate the festival’s increasing attendance.

“That really changed the evolution of the festival,” said Martinez. “It was a very naturally grown, grassroots kind of thing. It started as a community based thing and still is in various ways. We’re just adapting every year to the different challenges we have.”

This year the festival cost about $200,000 to put on, not to mention all the human capital, logistics and infrastructure something of this magnitude requires. The organizers have four staff members but rely on “an army of volunteers” to pull the festival off each year.

“It definitely takes a village,” Martinez and Salazar agreed. “Average festivals take about 10 months to a year to put it together, we did it in under three months,” Martinez added.

And that’s along with everything else that the Center for the Arts puts on, including concerts, exhibitions and educational programs. This year, they weren’t sure that they could pull the festival off because they started late due to a late vote on their budget from the nonprofit’s board of directors.
“It’s a very intense process,” said Martinez. “The reward at the end of the day is everybody coming to the festival and supporting it. That makes it worth it. We feel a commitment to bring that back year after year.”

Give and take

The festival is not something to be taken for granted, however. While the event is free, the center is asking for tax-deductible donations of $10 and $20. A $10 donation comes with a download of songs from 22 of the festival’s performers and a fast track through the security line into the event. A $20 donation comes with the download, fast track, access to the VIP area at the front of each stage, a T-shirt and a pair of tickets to other concerts held at the Center for the Arts.

“No one will be turned away for lack of funds,” said Martinez, “but it’s a similar pitch like you hear on NPR and public radio stations: If folks don’t support it, it’s one of those things that can go away. We’d like to keep it going. We’re really happy and excited that we’ve made it this far and we’d love to continue it.”

“We had to come up with that model just because the infrastructure was becoming costly,” said Salazar. “We break even. We’re not in this to make money but we want to cover our costs.”

For Martinez and Salazar, the best part of putting on the Eagle Rock Music Festival is giving local emerging artists the opportunity to play in front of thousands of people. 

“That, to me, is what’s really important about any kind of scene, whether it’s an art scene or music scene or whatever scene it is, to create a platform for those folks to go on to bigger and better things, and the Eagle Rock Music Festival has been that for its entire existence,” Martinez said. 
“Especially in the last seven years or so, we’ve been able to have bands that play who have gone on to bigger and better things because of organizations like ours, that are really pushing for that and letting people know that that’s something that’s important and they should support it,” he said. “I mean, it’s huge, man.” 

For the complete lineup, VIP access, and more information, visit eaglerockmusicfestival.org or cfaer.org.

Urban oasis

Marco Barrantes and Michelle Matthews of La Loma Development transform the local landscape one property at a time 

By Justin Chapman, Pasadena Weekly, 9/26/2013

Since 2007, the Pasadena-based sustainable design and urban landscape architecture firm La Loma Development Co. has turned schools, parks, museums, residential properties and other landscapes into beautiful, environmentally sound Gardens of Eden.

Now they’ve begun converting the property once utilized by historic Paul’s Auto in Northwest Pasadena, which serves as their headquarters.
The 30,000-square-foot auto mechanic yard and warehouse on the corner of Lincoln Avenue and Washington Boulevard is now being used as a center for green job training, ecological skills, sustainable development, urban architecture, permaculture, art and food systems.

Dubbed “The Shed” by La Loma founders Marco Barrantes and Michelle Matthews, an entrepreneurial married couple and new parents, it had its inaugural open house on July 14, with more than 200 people attending for presentations, food and live music.

Now, several more events are planned, with the next one taking place from 3 to 8 p.m. Sunday. Barrantes, Sustainable Food Systems adviser for University of California Cooperative Extension Rachel Surls, Muir Ranch Director Mud Baron and Panther Ridge Farms Manager and LA Neighborhood Land Trust Director Hop Hopkins will be discussing the past, present and future of urban agriculture in Los Angeles and how to shape current policy to encourage local communities to grow food instead of lawns.

‘Desert’ oasis
Barrantes and Matthews have big plans for The Shed. In what is currently a large concrete yard, they see a sustainable garden paradise.

“This whole location is the natural extension of La Loma’s original goal,” said Barrantes, principal of La Loma, “which is promoting, designing, creating and supporting sustainable communities with a big emphasis on local watersheds and food systems. We’ll have some sort of eco depot or permaculture nursery. Basically a demonstration site where we can really show off green roofs, green walls, green houses and natural pools, where we could hold educational workshops as well as events of any kind but specifically towards that end.”

The Shed is located in the middle of a large food desert in Northwest Pasadena. Barrantes said they want to have a food commissary on the property, which would include a partnership with the city of Pasadena in order to have food carts and trucks at the location. Jones Coffee said it would donate the equipment needed to have a café on site.

“We could have really big events, like farmers markets or crafts fairs or festivals,” said Barrantes. “With the food commissary we’ll help with the food desert problem in this area. There are a lot of people who walk by here from the different schools, there’s the business park and some city offices, so there’s a lot of people here and there’s no food. We want to solve that. By becoming more of a presence here we hope to change this derelict, no man’s zone that this corner was.”

Sustainable transformation
The Shed just happens to be the latest of La Loma’s varied and metamorphic projects. The sustainable development firm has been transforming public and private landscapes across LA County for years. It has received the Golden Arrow Award multiple times and this year won the city of Pasadena’s Green City Award in Urban Design.

They’ve worked on several local sustainable garden projects as well, including Arlington Gardens on South Pasadena Avenue, the rooftop garden of Art Center College of Design and natural habitats at schools such as Main Street Elementary in Los Angeles and Environmental Charter High School in Lawndale.

“We really like working with them,” said Barrantes. “The educational component in that is really fun as well, showing them that we can turn what was once just asphalt and dying lawn into a more natural habitat, a dry creek with a pond to attract butterflies, dragonflies and birds. We want to do the same type of thing for Kidspace Museum.”

Matthews said that her favorite project so far was the Public Fruit Theater, which was a broken concrete amphitheatre that La Loma built with artist collaboration group Fallen Fruit for LA County Museum of Art.

“It was a really pretty amphitheatre,” said Matthews, La Loma’s creative director. “There was an orange tree in the center to pay homage to the orange groves that used to be part of the county. We donated about $20,000 to get it built, but eventually they had us tear it down because it was in the way of a big tram that hauled the ($10 million, 340-ton ‘Levitated Mass’) boulder over from Riverside. I call it LACMA’s pet rock.”

Besides projects at parks and schools, La Loma also transforms residential properties into beautifully designed landscapes through urbanite, organic gardens, water harvesting and catchment, sustainable landscaping and engineering, green roofs, natural pools and habitat ponds.

The natural pools are an interesting feature because people can swim in them as well as drink from them.

“It’s at your own discretion to drink from it,” said Barrantes, “but it’s safe in the sense that it doesn’t have toxic waste, chlorine, chloramines or any of that stuff in there. It’s biologically filtered through the roots of the plants, which are growing essentially hydroponically in the gravel. If you really wanted to have it as drinking water you’d have to test it, but you feel good if you drink some of it, it’s not like you just drank chemicals. It doesn’t hurt your eyes or mess up your hair if you swim in it.”

“The main thing for me is when you go to these projects beforehand, you see a nice house with a lawn and a gated pool, and it’s fine,” said Matthews. “It’s like everybody else’s house. But then when you come back after Marco’s done with it and the design is done and everything’s installed and it’s a year later, it’s thriving. It feels good to be there. There are butterflies and hummingbirds and dragonflies. It smells good, feels good, looks good. It’s just a big difference and you notice it. People really love it. We have the opportunity to work with clients who really value what we do and give us free reign to do what we want. It’s a different energy, for sure.”

La Loma avoids putting in standard residential landscaping staples such as raised beds and planter boxes unless a client asks for them. They use minimal wood touching dirt, minimal lawn if any and minimal new cement if any. If a client wants a structure they try to be creative by using reclaimed wood, bamboo, timber and metal work. They get plants and materials from local nurseries.

“We try to walk the talk and stay as local as possible,” said Barrantes. “I totally cringe when we have to order something from Texas or Florida. Doesn’t make sense to me. We try to support local economies and have relationships with local vendors as much as possible.”
Family business

Barrantes and Matthews were introduced by a mutual friend in 2008 when Matthews was a senior designer at the Museum of Contemporary Art. At the time, she didn’t know what a landscape designer did. Her photography and artwork dealt with the failures of landscape. She was really impressed by the garden that he designed and built at his parents’ house. They began dating and he asked her to work with him.

After completion of what they call their demonstration garden at Barrantes’ parents’ house, Charles and Betty McKenney called and asked La Loma to help with Arlington Gardens, which Barrantes says was the catapult to success.
Barrantes, who has citizenships in Peru, Italy and the United States, got his master’s degree in landscape architecture at UC Berkeley, where he served for five years on the city’s Parks and Recreation Commission. This year, Barrantes and Matthews had a baby boy, Mateo. They said that running a business as a couple and new parents had its pros and cons.

“It’s beneficial but also a double-edged sword because you can talk about work all the time,” said Barrantes. “It never goes away. In any healthy relationship, when you work together, you have to have boundaries. I personally prefer not to wake up first thing in the morning and hear about something to do with work. But it is awesome; two heads are better than one.”

La Loma Development Co. presents “The Rebirth of an Agricultural Empire: From Top Food Producer to Food Desert, What Happened and What’s Next for Growing Food in Los Angeles County” from 3 to 8 p.m. Sunday at The Shed, 1355 Lincoln Ave., Pasadena. Tickets are $10 in advance, $15 at the door. Visit theshedpasadena.bpt.me for tickets. For more information, call (626) 421-6185 or visit lalomadevelopment.com.






Flowing forward

Rally looks to demonstrate grassroots support for alternative of LA River restoration

By Justin Chapman, Pasadena Weekly, 9/26/2013

The Los Angeles River will soon be getting a makeover, according to a study released by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers last week. The group is looking at five alternatives to restore 11 miles of the river from Griffith Park to downtown LA while maintaining existing levels of flood risk management, including a “no action” option.   

In response to the Draft Integrated Feasibility Report for the LA River Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Study, Tim Brick of the Arroyo Seco Foundation announced a “River Rally” to demonstrate and mobilize support for Alternative 20, which he says will result in the most expansive ecosystem restoration. The rally will be held at noon Saturday at the LA State Historic Park.

Along with the Verdugo Wash Confluence, Taylor Yard, Cornfields LA State Historic Park and Piggyback Yard, Alternative 20 would also include more restoration measures than any of the other alternatives to the Arroyo Seco Confluence, where the LA River meets the Arroyo Seco.
“It is crucial at this time to gather together the supporters of Los Angeles River restoration to demonstrate grassroots support for the best alternative that can be achieved,” said Brick, who organized the rally.

Along with the Arroyo Seco Foundation, the rally will include a litany of community groups and political leaders such as LAUSD board member Bennett Keyser, LA city councilman Gilbert Cedillo, LA River Revitalization Corporation, Northeast Los Angeles Riverfront Collaborative, North East Trees, Anahuak Youth Soccer, Environment Now, Save LA River Open Space and Urban Rivers Institute.

“The Army Corps LA River Study is a tremendous step in the right direction and the Corps deserves to be lauded for its detailed analysis,” said Meredith McKenzie of the Urban River Institute. “Nonetheless, the study does not go far enough. True long-term restoration of the LA River cannot be achieved without the inclusion of both the Arroyo Seco and Verdugo Wash confluences as well as the Cornfields Historic State Park. The only plan that addresses complete restoration along the LA River corridor is Alternative 20.”

According to the study, restoration measures considered include “creation and reestablishment of historic riparian strand and freshwater marsh habitat to support increased populations of wildlife and enhance habitat connectivity; to provide opportunities for connectivity to ecological zones, such as the Santa Monica Mountains, Verdugo Hills, Elysian Hills and San Gabriel Mountains; the reintroduction of ecological and physical processes, such as a more natural hydrologic and hydraulic regime that reconnects the river to historic floodplains and tributaries; reduced flow velocities; increased infiltration; improved natural sediment processes; and improved water quality. The study also evaluates opportunities for passive recreation that is compatible with the restored environment.”

A formal public comment period for the study began Friday and will be open until Nov. 5. Submit your comments to comments.lariverstudy@usace.army.mil.

Homes on the horizon

Liu’s bill ‘gets Caltrans out of the landlord business’ after a half-century

By Justin Chapman, Pasadena Weekly, 9/19/2013

Tenants renting homes once earmarked for destruction by Caltrans are one step closer to owning those properties following the unanimous passage of a bill now awaiting Gov. Jerry Brown’s signature.
Introduced by state Sen. Carol Liu (D-La Canada Flintridge) and co-authored by Democratic Assembly members Chris Holden of Pasadena and Mike Gatto of Burbank, Senate Bill 416 expedites the sale of more than 500 state-owned houses which were acquired by Caltrans through eminent domain and hardship sales more than 50 years ago. The state seized the properties in order to construct a road through the Los Angeles neighborhood of El Sereno, South Pasadena and western Pasadena to connect the 710 (Long Beach) and 210 (Foothill) freeways. The so-called “footprint” of the road, which includes the homes, is known as the 710 Corridor.
The bill, which passed the Assembly by a vote of 77-0 and the Senate by 38-0 margin, gives current tenants in good standing the first right of refusal to purchase their homes at fair market value. Brown has until Oct. 10 to sign or veto the bill.
 
The houses are no longer needed for a surface route connector freeway, making them surplus properties. Caltrans is currently studying other ways to connect the two freeways, including plans for a 4.5-mile tunnel from where the 710 ends in Alhambra through Pasadena.
Caltrans is the landlord to tenants residing in about 400 of those houses, the rest of which have been vacant for years and have fallen into disrepair. According to Robert Oakes, Liu’s legislative director, Caltrans wants to relinquish its role as landlord.
“The agency has told us that they want to get out of the real estate business,” said Oakes. “They’ve been quite clear. This bill helps them do that.”
One of the ways it helps them in that regard is by removing the requirement that Caltrans make any needed repairs before selling the homes. If the bill is signed into law, Caltrans would be able to sell the houses at “fair market value,” redefined to reflect the “as is” condition of the properties. Current law, known as the Roberti Bill, named for former Democratic state Sen. David Roberti, makes Caltrans responsible for repairs.
“If you own a house and it needs repairs, as a private seller you can opt to sell as is,” said Oakes. “Right now, Caltrans can’t do that. They face a hurdle that a private seller doesn’t. There’s an artificial barrier. Some houses need a lot of work. (SB416) levels the playing field.”
In August 2012, the California State Auditor found that between July 2007 and December 2011 Caltrans, which did not verify the eligibility of tenants to be charged below-market rate rents, collected $12.8 million in rent but lost $22 million due to underpayment by ineligible tenants. During most of that period, Caltrans reportedly paid out another $22.5 million for questionable repairs.
The audit also found that Caltrans:
* Spent an average of $6.4 million per year on property repairs but could not demonstrate that repairs for 18 of the 30 projects reviewed by auditors were reasonable or even necessary. 
* Authorized repairs that far exceeded the potential rental income of the property. For 20 of the 30 properties reviewed, Caltrans authorized repairs for which it will take more than three years worth of rental income to recover the costs, according to the report.
* Transferred an average of $4.7 million annually since fiscal year 2005-06 to the state Department of General Services for property maintenance, despite the fact that the two departments had been operating without an interagency agreement. In some instances, Caltrans was unable to provide records to substantiate its approval of General Services’ work either before or after the work was performed.
* Possibly inappropriately charged 330 hours of labor to projects related to the properties.
* Estimated that the market value of all the parcels was $279 million, when the actual sale price for many or potentially all of the residential parcels could be roughly 80 percent less than the estimated market value, in part because of restrictions contained in the Roberti Bill.
Six months after the audit’s release, Caltrans began increasing rents by 10 percent every six months, until people are paying market-value rents on the homes. The first increase went into effect on March 1. However, questions remain regarding whether all the tenants in the 710 Corridor would benefit from the bill and when Caltrans would start offering the homes for sale.
Joe Cano, a resident of El Sereno and an organizer with the group No on 710, isn’t sure that relieving Caltrans of the requirement to make costly repairs is such a good idea. Under the Roberti Bill and SB416, all single-family residences must first be offered to present occupants who fall into either low- or moderate-income categories at an affordable price.
“This is a quandary,” Cano said. “Do these people really have the money to fix the houses? Would these houses qualify for a mortgage or are they in such ill repair that the banks won’t even touch them? It still puts the tenants between a rock and a hard place. Either way, they’re being mistreated. It’s a real complex situation.”
Roberto Flores, a Caltrans tenant and a member of the United Caltrans Tenants group, is also unclear on whether there are disparities between the Roberti Bill and SB416.
 
“The biggest question we have is whether we’re going to have to, as individual tenants, give up our rights under the Roberti Bill,” he said. “It’s going to be kind of strange for them to offer these houses without waiving these rights. If we’re not covered by the Roberti Bill, are we covered by Liu’s bill? Many people have stayed in these houses for nearly 40 years for the dream of one day owning these houses under the Roberti Bill.”
 
Oakes said that all existing law would stay in place, including the requirement that Caltrans offer replacement dwellings to those who are unable to afford the price offered for the residential property.
“The point is Sen. Liu does not want Caltrans to continue being a landlord for six decades,” said Oakes. “It has now been five. The properties need to be sold. The housing market is finally getting better, prices are increasing; it’s a good time to sell.”
 
However, there is no timeline in SB416. It does not require Caltrans to begin selling the properties by a certain date, though the law would go into effect Jan. 1 should the governor sign it. Kelly Markham, a spokesperson for Caltrans, did not have a comment on Liu’s bill or what it would mean to the agency if approved. “We’re not going to speculate at this time,” said Markham. “Call us back when the governor signs the bill.”
Oakes said that while there is not a specific timeline, “The direction of the bill is to start selling. It clarifies and accelerates the process.”
In an email to constituents outlining his legislative victories during his first term, Holden wrote that SB416 “ensures the timely sale of surplus homes currently owned by Caltrans in the now-obsolete 710 Corridor. This bill is a critical first step to restoring peace and security to neighborhoods long threatened by Caltrans’ poor property management and an ill-advised surface extension of the 710.”
Flores said the United Caltrans Tenants group is currently reviewing the bill to see how it affects tenants and will be asking Liu’s office to break down the bill’s language at an upcoming workshop. 
Cano said members of his group are looking at their legal options, but in the meantime, “everything’s pretty much in stasis.” 
“The governor looks on it positively, so Sen. Liu hopes he will sign it,” said Oakes. “We’ve had good conversations with Caltrans’ director and the agency’s secretary.”
“This bill gets Caltrans out of the real estate management business, generates revenues for local transportation projects and returns these properties to our local tax rolls,” said Liu in a press release announcing the Senate’s passage of the bill on Sept. 10.